Legal Opinion

Davison v. Joseph Horne & Company

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1967No. Misc. 4293PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

This action was brought by the petitioner, Charles Davison, pro se in forma pauperis under the authority of the provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983). 1 Jurisdiction is here claimed by the petitioner by virtue of § 1343 of the Judicial Code (28 U.S.C. § 1343). 2 The petition also seeks the ap pointment of counsel to prosecute the asserted action of the petitioner as a plaintiff.

The pleading as presented is an integrated petition and complaint and avers that on or about January 22, 1965, as the plaintiff was leaving the downtown…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jerome MacLin v. Dr. FreakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. Seybold v. Milwaukee County SheriffDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967
  4. Colbert v. RickmonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API