Legal Opinion
Ardis O. Smart v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, Represa, California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1965No. 19735PublishedCited by 364 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant is a prisoner incarcerated in Folsom Prison. On July 20, 1964, appellant filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking damages and other equitable relief against the warden of Folsom Prison, appellee herein. In his complaint it is alleged that appellant prepared a petition for habeas corpus to be submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Clough v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Huffman v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Tate v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Meek v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
3Cited by364 opinions
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. First National Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Nancy S. Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. Zoological Society of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Viola McKinney v. Lee E. De BordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Elmo Williams v. H. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Calvin C. Shobe v. The People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.