Legal Opinion

Lacava v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2017No. J. Lacava v. SEPTA v. City of Philadelphia - 96, 119 and 120 C.D. 2016PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JUDGE McCULLOUGH

This matter involves various cross appeals from the December 21, 2015 orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court), which, inter alia, denied the City of Philadelphia’s (City) post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (judgment n.o.v.) and entry of judgment against Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA); denied SEPTA’s post-trial motion for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial; and denied Joseph Lacava’s (Lacava) post-trial motion to file an amended complaint.

Facts and Procedural History

On July 13, 2013,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Finn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Gardner v. Consolidated Rail Corp. SEPTASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Redmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. A. Turner & T. Govan-Turner v. Lower Merion S.D.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. C. Jakmian v. City of Philadelphia & SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Firearms Owners, Aplts v. Comm'r of PSPSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Firearms Owners, Aplts v. Comm'r of PSPSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API