Berger v. Schetman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 Carol Berger, the plaintiff below, appeals from the judgment, dated August 25, 2004, entered following the denial of her post trial motion on July 1, 2004, in which she requested a new trial based on her and her trial counsel’s allegation that a defense expert witness committed perjury. We affirm.
¶ 2 In a previous memorandum decision, we set forth the following factual and procedural recitation of the instant case:
[Ms. Berger] instituted this action against [William Schetman, M.D.], his professional corporation, and Lankenau Hospital based on an alleged misdiagnosis…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boucher v. Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. MervinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Guerrieri Et Ux. v. TysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Atwell v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- McCabe v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rose v. AnnabiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Berger v. SchetmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Nunemacher v. Sensinger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County2005
- Scranton Laminated Label, Inc. v. Florimonte, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013