Legal Opinion

Berger v. Schetman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.:

¶ 1 Carol Berger, the plaintiff below, appeals from the judgment, dated August 25, 2004, entered following the denial of her post trial motion on July 1, 2004, in which she requested a new trial based on her and her trial counsel’s allegation that a defense expert witness committed perjury. We affirm.

¶ 2 In a previous memorandum decision, we set forth the following factual and procedural recitation of the instant case:

[Ms. Berger] instituted this action against [William Schetman, M.D.], his professional corporation, and Lankenau Hospital based on an alleged misdiagnosis…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boucher v. Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. MervinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Guerrieri Et Ux. v. TysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Atwell v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. McCabe v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rose v. AnnabiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Berger v. SchetmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Nunemacher v. Sensinger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County2005
  4. Scranton Laminated Label, Inc. v. Florimonte, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API