Legal Opinion

Electrical Products Consolidated v. Smyser

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1943No. 29072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The plaintiff-appellant, Electrical Products Consolidated, a corporation, brought this action to recover with respect to a Neon sign furnished in 1940 to a restaurant then owned by Howard E. Chambers and operated by him under the name of “Nifty Hamburger.”

On May 17, 1941, Chambers executed a bill of sale, conveying all the property, equipment, supplies, good will, etc., of the Nifty Hamburger to Marjorie Ann Smyser, a daughter of Ray Smyser. At the trial of this action, she testified, stoutly and repeatedly, that she was the real purchaser and owner, although, in giving a deposition before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington Fruit & Produce Co. v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Waskey v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. York v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Smyser v. SmyserWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Smyser v. SmyserWashington Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hull v. MinklerWashington Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API