Legal Opinion

Hull v. Minkler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1958No. 34150PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is a garnishment action against the Mink-ler-Rodgers Motor Company, a partnership; the partners thereof, Victor Minkler and Fred Rodgers, individually and the marital community of each partner; and Glen Minkler, individually, and his marital community. The action is based on the primary liability of Glen Minkler.

On March 3, 1952, Victor Minkler and his wife entered into a conditional sale contract with Boyd C. Mabry for the transfer and sale of the personal property of the Minkler Motor Company, situate in Raymond, Washington, together with the good will and business of the company, for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kohn v. FishbachWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Plass v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Friedman v. BrannerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Rothchild Bros. v. TrewellaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mill & Logging Supply Co. v. West Tenino Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. Maurer & GarstWyoming Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API