Legal Opinion

York v. Stone

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1934No. 25218. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to quiet title to lots 4 to 8, inclusive, in block 413, in the Tacoma Land Company’s Third Addition to the city of Tacoma. The defendant appeared by answer and cross-complaint, and sought a judgment quieting the title in her, subject to the right of redemption by the plaintiffs. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment dismissing the cross-complaint and quieting the title in the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appeals.

The controlling facts are not in material dispute, and may be summarized as follows: Sometime prior to the year…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fruth v. Board of AffairsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Samet v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  3. Calhoun v. LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. McAlister v. PritchardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. Wapsie Power & Light Co. v. City of TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Marriage of LanghamWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Washington Fruit & Produce Co. v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In re the Marriage of HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Cutright v. RicheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API