Lindley v. Blumberg
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior -Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action to compel specific performance óf an option to purchase real estate. The option is contained in a lease of the premises which are the subject of the option.
Judgment was for defendant Dina E. Simpson, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
On the seventeenth day of January, 1901, William Simpson made a lease to plaintiff of the premises in dispute for the term of five years from that date, at a monthly rental of $10, payable quarterly in advance. The lease contained an option in the words and figures following, to wit:…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
- People v. Marblehead Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Mullins v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Ocean Shore Railroad v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.