State, Ex Rel. v. Sherrill
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
In disposing of this matter on the merits, we are confined to the issues as raised by the third defense of the answer, and may not concern ourselves with the wisdom or policy displayed by the United States Congress in passing the Federal Housing Act.
By the terms of such act a national housing authority is created, and empowered to loan and dispense government funds to duly constituted local housing authorities or agencies in the various states, for two principal purposes: (1) the eradication of so-called slum areas, “injurious to the health, safety and morals of the citizens of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Laret Investment Co. v. DickmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Harper v. McDavidSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority v. ThatcherOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. ThatcherOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority v. ThatcherOhio Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.