Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Thatcher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
We cannot accept appellant’s statement of the question of law involved, to wit:
“The question of law involved is whether tbe property belonging to Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority is exempt from taxation as public property used for a public purpose * * V’
The question before the Board of Tax Appeals was whether the property belonging to appellant is used exclusively for any public purpose. Unless the property is exclusively so used, it may not be exempted from taxation.
As said by Judge Shauck in City of Cincinnati v. Lewis, Aud., 66 Ohio St., 49, 55, 63 N. E., 588: “That the public…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Cullitan v. Cunningham SanitariumOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- American Bible Society v. Department of TaxationOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- State, Ex Rel. v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Bartlett v. ThatcherOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Ursuline Academy v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Zangerle v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.