Clark v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Stephen Clark (Claimant) appeals from two separate orders of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which denied his appeal nunc pro tunc and his petition for a remand and/or rehearing from the decision of the a referee.1 We affirm.
On March 2, 1982, Claimant was employed as a lawn spray technician for Keystone Lawn Spray (Employer). On that date, Claimant was exposed to various chemicals while in the course of his employment, and, as a result, developed a rash and peeling skin. Employer accepted this injury as com-pensable and issued a notice of compensation payable on April 2,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Magayna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Paxos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lako v. SCHLESSINGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Creighan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Crown, Cork & Seal Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matticks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Radhames v. Tax Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- School District of Philadelphia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Haverford State Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- R&L Carriers v. WCAB (T. Grace)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.