Legal Opinion

Creighan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1993No. 1303 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.

Leo Creighan (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which dismissed his appeal from a decision and order of the referee in a proceeding commenced by Claimant filing a petition to review a notice of compensation payable entered with his employer Mellon Stuart Corporation (Employer).

*622This appeal involves several issues which arise in the context of a workmen’s compensation proceeding where a claimant, in addition to being entitled to compensation under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act)1 asserts 2 a claim against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. Dauphin County Social Services for Children & YouthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Fatzinger v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palmosina v. Laidlaw Transit Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Clark v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. DePaul Concrete v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Harney v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Key v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API