Legal Opinion

People v. Ivenditti

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1969No. Crim. 15671PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

the Welfare and Institutions Code, the district attorney filed a petition for commitment of appellant as a narcotic drug addict. In due course appellant was arraigned and the matter was set for hearing. At such hearing on November 21, 1967, appellant was represented by private counsel who stated: “I would offer the following stipulation: That for the purpose of this hearing and this hearing only that counsel has talked and has advised his client and that he will stipulate that the doctors’ reports may come into evidence, and that the evidence of those reports is that he is either in imminent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. In Re GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mahdavi v. Fair Employment Practice Com.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Goodfriend v. Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Ida County Courier & the Reminder v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Cameron v. CozensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. State v. BoggsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API