Legal Opinion

In Re Gonzales

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1966No. Crim. 2606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus to set aside his commitment to the California Rehabilitation Center as a narcotic addict, purportedly pursuant to the provisions of former Penal Code, section 6450. He was not served with a certified copy of the order fixing the time and place of the hearing culminating in the commitment, as was prescribed by former Welfare and Institutions Code, section 5353. At the time and place set for the hearing, petitioner and his counsel appeared; a hearing was conducted; the court found petitioner to be a narcotic addict; and the commitment order.followed.

It…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. VictorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In re TrummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In re RanerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In re CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. WhelchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. IvendittiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. In Re GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API