Legal Opinion

Sanford Construction Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 12, 1968No. 1277PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SWINFORD, District Judge.

This is a diversity action brought by the buyer of aluminum sewer pipe against the seller for breach of warranty. The pipe was purchased for use as part of a storm sewer system in connection with a shopping center being constructed by plaintiff. After the pipe was installed, it allegedly collapsed and was excavated and replaced by steel pipe. Agents of the defendant inspected the site when the aluminum pipe was installed and at various times thereafter. But when the pipe was excavated, plaintiff refused to permit representatives of the defendant to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sachs v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  2. Colden v. R. J. Schofield MotorsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
  3. Franks v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1966
  4. Hoagland v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marine Petroleum Company v. Champlin Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pure Air on Lake Ltd., PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  3. Delcastor, Inc. v. Vail Assocs., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  4. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority v. Clow Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API