Delcastor, Inc. v. Vail Assocs., Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
In this diversity action, Plaintiff Rephidim asks me to reconsider, pursuant to Local Rule 602(c), Magistrate Clifton’s denial of its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 motion to compel discovery. For the reasons set forth below, Rephidim’s motion to compel discovery is granted.
On May 16, 1984 a mudslide occurred near Vail, Colorado. The following morning, engineering consultant Dr. Nicholas Lampiris investigated the mudslide at the behest of the defendant Vail. On July 13, 1984 Dr. Lampiris produced a report containing his observation of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heitmann v. Concrete Pipe MachineryDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
- Colden v. R. J. Schofield MotorsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
- Sanford Construction Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1968
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pure Air on Lake Ltd., PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Eliasen v. HamiltonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Agron v. Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Reems on Behalf of Reems v. HunkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Peters v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.