Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 13, 1997, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed. Although controverted, evidence was adduced that claimant was a shareholder and officer of Jack and Jill Nursery School, a business operated by his wife. While claimant contends that he had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of GaulandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of PodolskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of BezdezowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of BedrosianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API