Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rozestraten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decision that claimant was not totally unemployed during the time period covered by her June 17, 2003 *865claim due to her involvement in a closely-held corporation operated by her husband. The subchapter S corporation, which is in the business of producing commercial signs and graphics, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of CassaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BrinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re SingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of SalomoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Claim of GiganteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re the Claim of HazzardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API