Legal Opinion

Van Hollenbeck v. Insurance Co. of North America

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1987No. Docket 85615PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This case involves the cross-appeals from an order of declaratory judgment and supporting opinion entered by the Macomb Circuit Court. The court found that a personal catastrophe insurance policy issued by defendant, Insurance Company of North America (ina), did not afford liability coverage to plaintiff Homer J. Van Hollenbeck in a lawsuit filed against him by Select Markets, Inc., and its major shareholder, Michelle Abbruzzese, but that ina did owe Van Hollenbeck a duty to defend. Plaintiffs appeal as of right concerning the issue of ina’s liability under the policy, and defendant ina…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Stockdale v. JamisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Illinois Employers Insurance v. DragovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. KompusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. QuintanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. JablonskeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Federal Insurance v. X-Rite, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
  4. Central Michigan Board of Trustees v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  5. Dome Corp. v. KennardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API