Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance v. X-Rite, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 24, 1990No. 1:89-CV-470PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This case presents complementary actions for declaratory judgment concerning the parameters of an insurer’s contractual duty to defend claims brought against the insured. Specifically, the fundamental questions posed may be stated as follows: Where the insurer assumes its contractual duty to defend but reserves its right to contest its liability to indemnify the insured for certain of the claims, such that a potential conflict of interest arises, who is ultimately entitled to choose counsel and control the litigation; and if the insured…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Ben Arnold-Sunbelt Beverage Company Of South Carolina, LpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  2. Chi of Alaska, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Royal Oak Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear InsurersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API