Riddle v. Perry
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
1 1 Jesse Riddle appeals the district court's dismissal of his defamation claim against Lester Perry. Because the alleged defamatory statement was privileged, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
T2 When determining whether a trial court properly granted a motion to dismiss, we accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true and consider them, and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the non-*1131moving party. See, eg., Krouse v. Bower, 2001 UT 28, ¶2, 20 P.3d 895. We therefore assume the statement made by Mr. Perry, as discussed below, was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Coffin v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Russell v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Krouse v. BowerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- DeBry v. GodbeUtah Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Burns v. BoydenUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- O'CONNOR v. BurninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Cooper v. GlaserMontana Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.