Legal Opinion

Burns v. Boyden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2006No. 20050039PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 This case presents two distinct issues: (1) whether Dr. Brian D. Burns may claim the physician-patient privilege as a shield against a state investigation into his allegedly fraudulent billing practices, and (2) whether a secrecy order obtained by the State respecting this investigation is constitutional. As to the first issue, rule 506 of the Utah Rules of Evidence provides a physician presumptive authority to claim the physician-patient privilege “on behalf of the patient.” We hold that the State has rebutted this presumption by demonstrating that Burns is asserting the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Arbogast Family Trust v. River Crossings, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WallaceUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Snow, Christensen & Martineau v. LindbergUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Air Quality BoardUtah Supreme Court · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API