Burns v. Boyden
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 This case presents two distinct issues: (1) whether Dr. Brian D. Burns may claim the physician-patient privilege as a shield against a state investigation into his allegedly fraudulent billing practices, and (2) whether a secrecy order obtained by the State respecting this investigation is constitutional. As to the first issue, rule 506 of the Utah Rules of Evidence provides a physician presumptive authority to claim the physician-patient privilege “on behalf of the patient.” We hold that the State has rebutted this presumption by demonstrating that Burns is asserting the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BarrettUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Arbogast Family Trust v. River Crossings, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WallaceUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Snow, Christensen & Martineau v. LindbergUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Air Quality BoardUtah Supreme Court · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.