Legal Opinion

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. City of Baltimore

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 7, 2006No. CIV.A. RDB 04-3513PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BENNETT, District Judge.

On January 4, 2004, a water main that was between 93 and 99 years old ruptured and caused flooding at 210 E. Lexington Street in Baltimore, Maryland. This property was insured by The Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, a Connecticut company (“Hartford” or “Plaintiff’), who made payments to its insured in the amount of $561,309.02 for water damages caused by the flooding. Plaintiff subsequently filed a complaint in this subrogation action against the City of Baltimore (the “City” or “Defendant”), alleging that Defendant failed to properly maintain the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colbert v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API