Colbert v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Eyler, James R., J.
In a negligence suit against a municipality based on a failure to properly maintain its public facilities, it is reasonably well settled that a plaintiff must produce some evidence that the municipality knew or should have known of the alleged defect that caused damage. In this case, involving a rupture of a buried water main line, the question is whether evidence of water leaks generally and a failure to adequately maintain an aging water system is enough to create a jury question with respect to a buried water line that ruptures, either because it is sufficient to give…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Hickory Transfer Co. v. NezbedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Dover Elevator Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klock v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Osiris Holding v. DanielsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Williams v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020