Legal Opinion

Colbert v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 2, 2018No. 1610/16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eyler, James R., J.

In a negligence suit against a municipality based on a failure to properly maintain its public facilities, it is reasonably well settled that a plaintiff must produce some evidence that the municipality knew or should have known of the alleged defect that caused damage. In this case, involving a rupture of a buried water main line, the question is whether evidence of water leaks generally and a failure to adequately maintain an aging water system is enough to create a jury question with respect to a buried water line that ruptures, either because it is sufficient to give…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Pahanish v. Western Trails, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Hickory Transfer Co. v. NezbedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Hamilton v. Kirson Alston v. 2700 VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Dover Elevator Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klock v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  2. Osiris Holding v. DanielsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  3. Williams v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API