Legal Opinion

Temple of 1001 Buddhas v. City of Fremont

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 2024No. A167719Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/6/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR TEMPLE OF 1001 BUDDHAS et al., Plaintiffs and A167719 Appellants, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. CITY OF FREMONT, 21CV002808) Defendant and Respondent. This appeal arises from a final administrative decision after a hearing upholding nuisance determinations and orders with respect to plaintiffs’ residential property. Plaintiffs’ main claim is that section 1.8.8 of the California Building Code (Building Code) preempts the City of Fremont’s process for appeals…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Haas v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API