Hughes v. Lazard
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. Joseph D. Bethnne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBouse, J.
This is an action in ejectment for the north half of lot 4 in block 223 in the city of Tucson. The said lot had been sold to the territory for the taxes for the year 1890, which had become delinquent. The time for redemption hav*5ing expired, a tax-deed was duly executed to the territory for said lot: Thereafter the board of supervisors of Pima County sold said lot to plaintiff, and executed a deed to him therefor. Plaintiff bases his right of action for the possession of said lot on the title created by said tax-deed. Defendant contends that the tax-deed to the territory is void, because the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Levy'sArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Mining v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1906
- Territory of Arizona ex rel. Clark v. GainesArizona Supreme Court · 1908