Legal Opinion
Vanderbilt Growth Fund, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1980No. Civ. 58503PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Petitioners Vanderbilt Growth Fund, Inc., Vanderbilt Income Fund, Inc., and Pegasus Income & Capital Fund, Inc., seek a writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to vacate two orders granting motions of real party in interest Arthur Young & Company (Arthur Young) for summary adjudication of the issues of certain damages in petitioners’ action against Arthur Young based on negligence and breach of contract. On March 5, 1980, we issued an alternative writ.
The first cause of action (negligence) of petitioners’ second amended complaint alleges: Each of the petitioners…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Nazaroff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- California Press Manufacturing Co. v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- LaRosa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.