Legal Opinion

Tolar v. Amax Coal Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1993No. 92-282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Jackie and Ada Tolar appeal from the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of Amax Coal Company, wherein the district court found that the cause of any damage to the Tolars’ businesses was the result of a downturn in the Gillette economy and not the result of the escape of methane and hydrogen sulphide gases from a mine developed by Amax.

We reverse.

The Tolars state these issues:

1. Did the trial court err in determining as a matter of law that the appellants incurred no damages as a proximate cause of the appellee’s negligence?

2. Did the trial court err in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Eisenbarth v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Romero v. HoppalWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Jurkovich v. Estate of TomlinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D & D Transport, Ltd. v. Interline Energy Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API