Legal Opinion

Romero v. Hoppal

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1993No. 92-159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This was an action by respondents Hop-pal against petitioners, State of Wyoming and its employee, to recover personal injury and wrongful death damages. The State of Wyoming, claiming the bar of governmental immunity, moved for summary judgment. Respondents Hoppal moved also for summary judgment. The trial court denied the State’s summary judgment motion and partially granted Hoppals’ summary judgment, holding immunity was not available to the State. We granted the State’s petition for writ of certiorari to answer the following question:

Whether Wyo.Stat. § 1 — 39—120(a)(iii),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oroz v. Board of County Com'rs of Carbon CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Soles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zmijewski v. WrightWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Board of Equalization v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Elmore v. Van HornWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harbel v. WintermuteWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Anderson Highway Signs & Supply, Inc. v. CloseWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wyoming State Hospital and State of Wyoming v. Mary Romine and Donald Romine, as Guardians and Conservators for and On Behalf of Justina Case, Their WardWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality v. Wyoming Outdoor CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Prudential Preferred Properties v. Underwood Ranch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API