State v. . Lockey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
The defendant was convicted of exercising the trade or profession of barbering without obtaining the certificate of registration, as required by the Barber’s Act, chapter 119, Public Laws of 1929, and from the judgment upon such conviction, appealed to this Court.
The practice of barbering is defined in section 2 of the act. The act became effective June 30, 1929. The evidence shows that the defendant was operating a one-chair barber shop in the city of Fayetteville, after the effective date of the Barber Act, without having obtained a certificate of registration, as required by that act. This…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re Applicants for LicenseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- McNaughton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- State v. CallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Roller v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.