Legal Opinion

State v. . Stevenson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1891PublishedCited by 24 opinions

This was a CRIMINAL ACTION, tried at July Term, 1891, of the Criminal Court of New PIanover, County, Meares, J., presiding, similar to that of State v. French, ante, except that the jury found in the special verdict these additional facts: “ That during the said six months the said defendants also bought and sold within the -said State large quantities of goods, wares and merchandise, including farm products which were not purchased from the producer.

Read the full summary

This was a CRIMINAL ACTION, tried at July Term, 1891, of the Criminal Court of New PIanover, County, Meares, J., presiding, similar to that of State v. French, ante, except that the jury found in the special verdict these additional facts: “ That during the said six months the said defendants also bought and sold within the -said State large quantities of goods, wares and merchandise, including farm products which were not purchased from the producer. And that all of the purchases so made, both in the State of North Carolina and out of it, were of goods, wares and merchandise not specially…

1Opinion of the Court

(/lark, J :

The defendants, merchants residing and doing business in this State, have bought out of the State and have brought into the State and sold goods not being farm products purchased from the producer, and have bought in the State and sold farm products which were not purchased from the producer. They refused to list them under Schedule B, Section 22, of the Revenue Act, and they contend the act is void and unconstitutional because—

1. “It denies to the defendants the equal protection of the laws. U. S. Cons., 14th Amendment, § 1.” It has been repeatedly held that the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Minnesota v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Home Insurance v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Brimmer v. RebmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Gatlin v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Roach v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Hale v. County Treasurer of Mineral Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Ex parte BylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Bickett v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API