Legal Opinion

Payne v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 18, 2008No. 58638-6-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 There are only limited circumstances under which a purchaser of corporate assets acquires a transferor’s liabilities, such as by de facto merger or by continuing the same product line. Here, there are no such circumstances. Viad Corporation’s predecessor, Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton (PA), did not acquire Griscom-Russell’s asbestos-related liabilities when it purchased GriscomRussell’s parent company, Hamilton Thomas, in 1962. Harold, and Elizabeth Payne have failed to present evidence of continuity of ownership of the merged company, required for finding a de facto merger, and failed to present…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West Consultants, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. West Consultants, Inc., App/resp. v. Deltek, Inc., Et Ano, Resp/cross-apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API