State v. Poole
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The record on appeal is voluminous and contains numerous exceptions, but the most serious deals with the statement of the defendant to the officers on the night of her arrest.
Did the court err in overruling the objection of the defendant to improper and irrelevant evidence as to comments of the defendant not involved in her statement which was the subject of a Motion to Suppress, but which evidence was allowed to be injected into the bearing and which defendant contends was prejudicial? Defendant contends that the only reason she was asked by the officers if it bothered her as to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. RedfernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ToomerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983