Legal Opinion

State v. Toomer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 631A83PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant first contends the trial court erred by permitting the district attorney to read into evidence a transcription of Detective Harris’ taped interview with Roderick Smith. Defendant objects to this evidence on the ground that the State failed to lay a proper foundation for its admissibility.

In order to insure proper authentication of a tape recording, this Court held in State v. Lynch, 279 N.C. 1, 181 S.E. 2d 561 (1971), that the following requirements must be met before a tape recorded statement may be admitted into evidence:(1) that the recorded testimony was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. ChatmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State v. LattimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. MullicanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API