Legal Opinion

Schwartzel v. Karnes

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1896No. 112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Wyandotte district court; Henry L. Alden, judge. Action by J.-V. 0. Karnes and others against John Schwartzel to recover attorney’s fees. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gar ver, J. :

The judgment complained of in this case was rendered by the district court of Wyandotte county in an action brought by the defendants in error (plaintiffs below) against the plaintiff in error (defendant below) to recover for attorney’s fees alleged to be due and owing for professional legal services performed by the plaintiffs at the special instance and request of the defendant. The answer was a general denial.

It is the first claimed that there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff. This objection was made for the first time upon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dermott v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  3. Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Mansur v. BottsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mug v. OstendorfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Paterson v. CondosNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Foulger v. McGrathUtah Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API