Legal Opinion

Foulger v. McGrath

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1908No. 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by Fred Foulger against John McGrath and another. The action was dismissed as to defendant John M. McGrath, and from a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Mary McGrath appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

This is an action to recover a balance alleged to be due for the construction of a certain building with additions thereto. The respondent substantially alleges in his complaint that in January, 1906, he and the appellant entered into a written agreement, whereby respondent agreed to build, replace, and repair the house, titchen, and wash room of the appellant, which were damaged and partially destroyed by fire, for the agreed price of $877, and which is the reasonable value thereof. The agreement is set forth in full in the complaint, and it is provided therein that respondent shall “build,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Burgess v. HelmNevada Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Wilson v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Todd v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emergency Physicians Integrated Care v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Fischer Imaging Corp. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Paterson v. CondosNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Boroughs v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API