State v. Demopoulos
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant was convicted of arson and appeals from the order denying a new trial.
Before the trial was begun, defendant made a motion to require the state to elect whether it “will attempt to prove under the indictment in said matter at the trial of said action (a) that defendant set the building referred to therein on fire himself or (b) that he procured the setting of said fire by another.” The motion was denied. State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92, 114 N. W. 363, 14 Ann. Cas. 309, sustains the ruling, and no more need be said on that point.
Defendant was a tenant of the store and basement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State v. KorschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- People v. SweeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. AzzoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. StarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.