State v. Star
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Judge.
Defendant, convicted of third degree burglary, appeals from an order denying his motion (1) for judgment notwithstanding the verdict upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain it or (2) for a new trial because of newly discovered evidence.
Defendant’s principal contention is that the testimony of Edward A. Pec, an admitted accomplice, was not sufficiently corroborated by other evidence to meet the requirements of M. S. A. 634.04, which provides that: “A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless it is corroborated by such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. KressNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Privett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.