State v. Whitman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Thomas Whitman from a judgment of the district court of Hennepin county convicting him of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree, and from an order, Dickinson, J., denying his motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was convicted in the district court of the county of Hennepin of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree. He appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The indictment, which was upon its face sufficient in form and substance, charged the defendant, as a principal, with the crime of grand larceny in ' the second degree. The evidence showed that he was not physically present when the larceny was consummated, but it did show beyond any reasonable doubt that he procured his codefendants to commit the crime and aided and advised them in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . BlivenNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- State v. LawlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- State v. GiffordWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- United States v. LylesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1834
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.