Legal Opinion

People v. Alberts

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

138 Cal.App.2d Supp. 909 (1955)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

DAVID S. ALBERTS, Appellant.

California Court of Appeals.

Dec. 29, 1955.

C. Richard Maddox and Stanley Fleishman for Appellant.

A. L. Wirin, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

S. Ernest Roll, District Attorney, and Jere J. Sullivan, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent.

BISHOP, J.

The defendant was convicted on two charges based on section 311 of the Penal Code: that he had lewdly kept for sale obscene and indecent books; and that he had lewdly written, composed, and published an advertisement of them. A new trial was denied, and a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railway Mail Assn. v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Swearingen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API