Legal Opinion

People v. Alberts

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided December 29, 1955No. Crim. A. No. 3350Published

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The defendant was convicted on two charges based on section 311 of the Penal Code: that he had lewdly kept for sale obscene and indecent books; and that he had lewdly written, composed, and published an advertisement of them. A new trial was denied, and a sentence (its terms not divulged) was imposed. The appeal is from the order and judgment.

Section 311, Penal Code, declares a large number of acts, if lewdly done, to be a misdemeanor. Subdivision 3 of the section alone lists some 19 of these acts, and in the first count of the complaint it was charged that the defendant had done all of them.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railway Mail Assn. v. CorsiSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Swearingen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. People v. McClennegenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API