Legal Opinion
Archibald D. L. Hutchinson v. Pacific Car & Foundry Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 2, 1963No. 17652PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Archibald D. L. Hutchinson and Coast Equipment Company sued appellee Pacific Car & Foundry Company for patent infringement. Pacific counterclaimed for declaratory judgment. After a trial to the court judgment was for Pacific, and appellants appeal that portion holding Claims Four through Eight of Patent No. 2,890,909 invalid and uninfringed.
Coast Equipment is wholly owned by Hutchinson and his wife, and is a licensee under Hutchinson’s patent. It manufactures dump-truck bodies and dump-truck hoisting equipment. Pacific produces various types of trucks. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Research Products Co. v. Tretolite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Joel A. Del Francia v. Stanthony Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Superior Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1963
- Bates Industries, Inc. v. Daytona Sports Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1969