Legal Opinion
Bates Industries, Inc. v. Daytona Sports Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 14, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 67-1490PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PREGERSON, District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement brought against defendants, Daytona Sports Co. and Daytona Products, Inc. Paulson Manufacturing Co. was permitted to intervene and be joined as a defendant. Defendants and intervenor filed this motion for summary judgment. The matter came on for hearing and was submitted to the Court for its decision. Having read all the pleadings *312and papers on file and having considered the oral arguments of counsel, the Court now makes the following findings of fact and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Jack Barofsky v. General Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Grayson Heat Control v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Pullman Incorporated v. Acf Industries IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Archibald D. L. Hutchinson v. Pacific Car & Foundry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Convergence Corp. v. VideomediaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Bates Industries, Inc. v. Daytona Sports Co. And Daytona Products, Inc., and Paulson ManufacturingcorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971