Legal Opinion
Ross v. Travelers Indemnity Company
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 2, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
The Canterbury Shop was a clothing store owned and operated by the plaintiff. The defendant insured this business and included in the policy was an indemnity covering burglary. This complaint sought recovery for merchandise burglariously stolen and for “business interruption” losses resulting therefrom. Following a jury trial the plaintiff received a verdict of $16,- 850.00 but, on defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v., 1 this award was set aside and judgment was ordered for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed and the defendant then entered a cross-appeal premised on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Manchester v. DuganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Boetsch v. Rockland JayceesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Limberis v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Kretschmer's House of Appliances, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Klein & Brown, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCivil Court of the City of New York · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baybutt Construction Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Norman v. BanasikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Ochsner Clinic Foundation v. Lexington Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
- Govern. Emp. Ins. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.