Legal Opinion

Klein & Brown, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 24, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert B. Evans, J.

The plaintiffs doing business under the name and style of Klein & Brown, Inc., sue to recover for the loss of a large number of valuable fur skins from premises 352-354 Seventh Avenue, their place of business, for which loss plaintiffs allege they were insured by the defendant under its policy of burglary insurance.

The defendant’s answer consisted of a “General Denial” and, as a complete affirmative defense, the defendant claims that *396plaintiff’s alleged loss was not covered "by its policy because it was not the result of a burglary within the meaning or definition set forth in indorsement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Cherry Creek National Bank v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. United Sponging Co. v. Preferred Accident InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  4. Lee v. Preferred Accident InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  5. Haas v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. Weldcraft Equipment Co. v. Crum & Forster Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. C & J Fertilizer, Inc. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API