Legal Opinion

Kretschmer's House of Appliances, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 23, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.. The question is whether the loss sustained by appellant appliance dealer by reason of the disappearance of several thousand dollars’ worth of new television sets from appellant’s warehouse is covered by qppellant’s “Special Multi-Peril Policy” with appellee insurance company. The circuit court said “no” and entered summary judgment for the insurer. The insured has appealed.

The policy contained this clause:

“M. Premises Burglary or Robbery: Loss by burglary shall cover the felonious abstraction of insured property * * * from within the premises by a person making…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernard v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Ross v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Weldcraft Equipment Co. v. Crum & Forster Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Norman v. BanasikSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Kojsza v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API