Legal Opinion

Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. Holiday

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 26, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: In a filiation proceeding, the proof must be entirely satisfactory. (People v. Borner, 280 App. Div. 141; Commissioner v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607.) In this ease, the bill of particulars claimed a normal period of gestation and on this theory the ease was tried. Assuming that the period of gestation was 280 days, by the complaining witness’ own admission, the respondent was absent from the community when the conception is claimed to have occurred. In addition, the testimony of the complaining witness tended to establish that there was a normal menstrual period after the alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. People v. BornerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chaney v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Erie County Commissioner of Social Services v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Juleah Co. v. Incorporated Village of RoslynNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stenzel v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Ashquabe v. McConnellNew York Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API