Legal Opinion

Ashquabe v. McConnell

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*212OPINION OF THE COURT

John M. Curran, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Defendant moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff did not suffer a “serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiff has cross-moved for an order granting partial summary judgment on the issue of liability and for the dismissal of certain affirmative defenses.

This case presents certain issues which should be addressed in the wake of the Court of Appeals decision in Pommells v…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Giraldo v. MandaniciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Esposito v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashquabe v. McConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API