Legal Opinion
Juleah Co. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrew J. Di Paola, J.
The plaintiff, Juleah Co. (Juleah), a New York limited partnership, is the lessee under a ground lease for real property with the buildings and improvements thereon consisting of 381 residential apartments known as the Roslyn Garden Apartments located within the corporate limits of the defendant, Incorporated Village of Roslyn (Village). This action for money damages, injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment nullifying a current Village contract for sanitation services with Donno Co., Inc., arises from the method of allocating charges for such services to Juleah. A review of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gleason v. GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Nehrbas v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coconato v. Town of EsopusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Juleah Co. v. Incorporated Village of RoslynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977