Legal Opinion

People v. Borner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In filiation proceedings, the proof must be “ entirely satisfactory ” to sustain an order. (Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Hotel, 256 App. Div. 352; *142Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607; Drummond v. Dolan, 155 App. Div. 449.) On this record it is our opinion that the proof is clearly insufficient in quality and quantity to warrant an order adjudging the defendant to be the father of the child. The order awarded counsel fees to the Niagara County Commissioner of Public Welfare. While the father of a child born out of wedlock is liable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Drummond v. DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erie County Board of Social Welfare v. HolidayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  2. Hawthorne v. HuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API